I note - I tried using Google Image search (see a discussion of how to do this here) and it finds some other versions of this cartoon online but none of them have a source for it either.
So - does anyone out there know where this came from?
I recently gave a talk where I combined what are normally two distinct topics - the Evolution of DNA Sequencing, and the use of Sequencing t...
hmm...
ReplyDeletea google search for the text yields this:
http://cmbi.bjmu.edu.cn/news/0211/43.htm
interesting ... for some reason my google search with the text did not find that ... but I would bet the cartoon went with that article
ReplyDeletethanks
I always thought it was when your acronym was used in papers, sans citation (PCR, BLAST, etc)
ReplyDelete;-)
The Other Jim
Referomics...citomics....no, no, that way lies madness!!
ReplyDeleteTinEye yields nothing:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.tineye.com/search/a17c7dd5eb0e10dcfbe86427afc9763230423fbe/
Igor
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletefunny that the crusade to end the use of bad-omics has become c-omics
ReplyDeleteHaving something named after you. Smith-Waterman algorithm. Dayhoff matrix. Krebs cycle. Mendelian inheritance. And, of course, eisenomics http://eisenomics.wordpress.com/
ReplyDeleteOne I am waiting to see is "fam-omics"...as we're seeing that, at least for now, taking a good family history is about as informative as any genome wide scan for complex diseases
ReplyDeleteDid you use Google images?
ReplyDeleteI recently went to a talk on "extracellular matridomics": the study of all the components of the extracellular matrix. (So why not just say that you study the extracellular matrix?)
ReplyDelete