I re-discovered it because I am making a compilation of papers by Woese in relation to the tribute page I have set up. And the title (a manifesto about microbial genomics) combined with the date (1998 - early in the genome sequencing era) struck me as something worth looking at. Plus I knew others (e.g., Phil Hugenholtz, Nikos Kyrpides, ...) had mentioned this paper to me so I figured - hey - how about actually reading it in detail. And fortunately it is freely available at the Current Biology web site (not sure why that is actually). Anyway - what I found in the paper is basically an argument for much of my career from 1998-2008.
Some choice lines in here but the crux is as follows
The first order of business in microbial genomics should be a phylogenetically representative genomic screen of the microbial world. In other words, all the major microbial taxa and their subdivisions — which are the major source of biological diversity on Earth — should be represented by several genome sequences. There are now more than 30 recognized major eubacterial taxa — each the phylogenetic equivalent of a eukaryotic kingdom — and at least half that number in the (far less well characterized) Archaea; not to mention the yet-to-be-discovered kingdoms among the unicellular eukaryotes.This basically lays out the Tree of Life project I co-ran at TIGR and the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project I co-ran / run at the DOE JGI.
The ending is perfect
This is not the place to go into the specifies of which microbial genomes would be most useful. I would suggest, however, that a phylogenetic tree hang on the wall of every laboratory in which microbial genomes are being sequenced — for inspiration.Somehow I had missed the crux of this paper until now. I think it is worth reading by everyone out there working on microbes and/or their genomes.
Oh - and here is the compilation of Woese's papers I am making in Mendeley.
Papers by Carl Woese is a group in Biological Sciences on Mendeley.
Post a Comment