This new fangled gel they have made they are very proud of. That is good. Pride in ones work is a good thing. But getting the science wrong and making misleading statements is not. Some statements I have issues with include
- Able to colonize on almost any tissue or surface, microbial biofilms - which are adhesive groupings of diseased cells present in 80% of all infections - persist at various sites in the human body, especially in association with medical equipment and devices.
- Huh? Diseased cells? What does this even mean?
- When applied to contaminated surfaces, the hydrogel’s positive charge attracts all negatively charged microbial membranes, like powerful gravitation into a blackhole.
- Again - huh? How is this like gravitation in a black hole?
- However, unlike most antibiotics and hydrogels, which target the internal machinery of bacteria to prevent replication, this hydrogel kills bacteria by membrane disruption, precluding the emergence of any resistance.
- This is the killer statement. They have apparently invented a treatment that no organism can resist. It is therefore perfect. Sort of like, well, penicillin? Oh no, wait. Sort of like chloroquine. Oh no, wait. I mean, sort of like streptomycin right? Sorry - I meant tetracycline. No no - I meant .... aaaaaaaaaaarrg.
I could go on. Sounds like a possibly interesting new development. But when you make absurd claims about it, and get the science all messed up, it does not give me that warm fuzzy feeling. Annoyingly some news sources are basically just quoting from the PR with no skepticism. For example, see this Daily Mail article. And this blip in The Star. At least this in "The Conversation" has some comments on this being possibly overblown. Anyway, shame on IBM for being more about hype than science.