Monday, September 29, 2008
Science Faux Pas #4: Nature wishes their dog ate this advertisement
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Most recent post
A ton to be thankful for -- here is one part of that - all the acknowledgement sections from my scholarly papers
So - it is another Thanksgiving Day and in addition to thinking about family, and football, and Alice's Restaurant, I also think a lot a...
-
I have a hardback version of The Bird Way by Jennifer Ackerma n but had not gotten around to reading it alas. But now I am listening to th...
-
There is a spreading surge of PDF sharing going on in relation to a tribute to Aaron Swartz who died a few days ago. For more on Aaron ...
-
Wow. Just wow. And not in a good way. Just got an email invitation to a meeting. The meeting is " THE FIRST ANNUAL WINTER Q-BIO ...
I guess I'm not seeing the problem. Even if it *was* deliberate, what's the issue? If it had been a picture of a dog and a human, the candidate who was being "represented" in canine form could see it as an insult, but two dogs?
ReplyDeleteWell, you may not get it, but Nature said
ReplyDelete"The journal swears they were not being deliberately cheeky. "We didn't know until the issue landed on our desks," Nature pleads. "It just goes to show that editorial and advertising aren't working in cahoots.
So that is what I was kind of trying to convey. I am not saying this is a huge screw up. Just a funny slip. Maybe "Freudian Slip" would have been a better title.