So I searched for "Genome sequence" on the Nature site
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1297/e1297ca5d02ce417eebf57150cde6d76f7bb8b0c" alt=""
And, well, I found a doozy of an example of a paper that is supposed to be openly available but is not. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b33a/6b33a767e7bcaab6d8bdf678da0aacb845a76529" alt=""
That's right. The "public" human genome paper is not freely or openly available. It is $4.99 to rent or $20 to purchase. Is this Nature's way of saying "We think the Lander et al. paper did not actually report on a genome?" and that the Venter paper truly won the race? I don't think so. I think this is a way of Nature saying "How can we make money off of our past papers? Which one gets a lot of looks? What? It is freely available? Change that." or something like that.
Want to bet they will say this is a mistake? Want to bet they will not refund anybody's money who paid for this?
Here is a simple solution for everyone out there. Do not trust Nature Publishing Group to make something available even if they say they will.
UPDATE 9/25 1 PM
But wait - there is more. The Plasmodium genome paper, which I wrote about in 2012 not being available and which Nature promised to fix is again behind a pay wall
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb542/cb5422803ae395a9d333cc3e0f631857ea91f657" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1516d/1516dadf7adc96b8e65599b10f17706cff3db4f4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7fe1/e7fe1d02765ae953b4657bf3e813642fddf7742e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f326/6f326650c5255dc9fefa21a5cf2c003f16151fa9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92764/9276466d83c8381547a8bf8c3e58db7ccd0b0dce" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54e0d/54e0d03921a2bb0600d6b7a4a81a8a9b9da7daa9" alt=""
And more
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87a6f/87a6f2fa41194f9d43279a47824dfab7d990c7e7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6acb/c6acb11e8d5cd1970338bd35926bae0351dfe81a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64cf6/64cf6984dff8381caddad706c3e655a73a73a068" alt=""
UPDATE 10/16/17
Nature has apologized and said they fixed the issue and will refund any money people spent to buy these articles
— Nature Research (@nresearchnews) October 16, 2017
— Nature Research (@nresearchnews) October 16, 2017
No comments:
Post a Comment