tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10781944.post5321253307974659865..comments2024-03-28T00:36:36.460-07:00Comments on The Tree of Life: An Anti Anti-Evolution Petition to reclassify non-science books from science categories in bookstores and librariesJonathan Eisenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07953790938128734305noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10781944.post-31088236058760716252009-01-18T06:34:00.000-08:002009-01-18T06:34:00.000-08:00Natural selection is the exact opposite of random....Natural selection is the exact opposite of random.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10781944.post-87858282431060188352007-09-27T23:27:00.000-07:002007-09-27T23:27:00.000-07:00What does the comment of the annomnymous writer ha...What does the comment of the annomnymous writer have to do with the claim that evolution is a fact?<BR/><BR/>Most creationists get side tracked and don't address the evidence at all (non-sequeters). <BR/><BR/>When they do address them, they got it all wrong (like random natural selection).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10781944.post-47227208783816216832007-09-19T10:52:00.000-07:002007-09-19T10:52:00.000-07:00Bingo John L. I was waiting for someone to say th...Bingo John L. I was waiting for someone to say that.Jonathan Eisenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07953790938128734305noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10781944.post-46356578909858749082007-09-19T10:49:00.000-07:002007-09-19T10:49:00.000-07:00If anonymous is afraid of identifying him/her self...If anonymous is afraid of identifying him/her self it tells me that he/he is running scared. Sheesh.John Logsdonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17531681775278694585noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10781944.post-4605796539987944062007-09-17T10:02:00.000-07:002007-09-17T10:02:00.000-07:00If evolutionists are afraid of the Intelligent Des...If evolutionists are afraid of the Intelligent Design books, it tells me that they are running scared. <BR/><BR/>If evolutionists want to end the arguments all they have to do is, get their brilliant heads together and assemble a 'simple' living cell. This should be possible, since they certainly have a very great amount of knowledge about what is inside the 'simple' cell. <BR/> <BR/>After all, shouldn't all the combined Intelligence of all the worlds scientist be able the do what chance encounters with random chemicals, without a set of instructions, accomplished about 4 billion years ago,according to the evolutionists, having no intelligence at all available to help them along in their quest to become a living entity. Surely then the evolutionists scientists today should be able to make us a 'simple' cell.<BR/> <BR/>If it weren't so pitiful it would be humorous, that intelligent people have swallowed the evolution mythology.<BR/> <BR/>Beyond doubt, the main reason people believe in evolution is that sources they admire, say it is so. It would pay for these people to do a thorough examination of all the evidence CONTRARY to evolution that is readily available: Try answersingenesis.org. The evolutionists should honestly examine the SUPPOSED evidence 'FOR' evolution for THEMSELVES.<BR/> <BR/>Build us a cell, from scratch, with the required raw material, that is with NO cell material, just the 'raw' stuff, and the argument is over. But if the scientists are unsuccessful, perhaps they should try Mother Earth's recipe, you know, the one they claim worked the first time about 4 billion years ago, so they say. All they need to do is to gather all the chemicals that we know are essential for life, pour them into a large clay pot and stir vigorously for a few billion years, and Walla, LIFE!<BR/> <BR/>Oh, you don't believe the 'original' Mother Earth recipe will work? You are NOT alone, Neither do I, and MILLIONS of others!<BR/> <BR/>PS: Please don't lie about the 'first life' problem, scientists are falling all over themselves to make a living cell. Many have admitted publicly that it is a monumental problem. And is many years away from happening, if ever. Logical people understand this problem and have rightly concluded that an Intelligent Designer was absolutely necessary. Think of it this way, if all the brilliant scientists on earth can't do it how on earth can anyone believe that it happened by accident?????Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com