- Australia possesses some organisms with unique genetic resources
- Other countries have gotten more out of these resources than Australia has
- Australia is now letting other countries read the entire genetic code of some of these organisms and (gasp) putting this information into the public domain
- Australia loses out on some of the money and or intellectual property that could come from the sequence information
- Therefore, Australia should stop participating in collaborative genome sequencing projects, at least for native Australian species
This is of course not the first time this issue has come up. Diversa, for example, which has sampled the world looking for novel enzymes, has been accused of biopiracy wherever it goes (e.g., see here). They have argued that what they are doing is bioprospecting, not biopiracy. However this argument did not always calm critics in various locations.
Diversa has been accused of biopiracy in part because they are a for profit company trying to benefit directly from other countries biological resources, much like those looking for new drugs in the tropics. Since Diversa did their work through molecular biology, they were viewed in many countries much like GMOs are. Many other companies doing "bioprospecting" have also been accused of biopiracy and I guess the truth of the accusations depend on the company involved.
However, what we have now is potentially much more damaging to scientific research. These people are in essence arguing against ANY release of genomic information regarding organisms native to other countries because once the information is out, the countries lose control over how it might be used. See for example
- Slashdot story about google being accused of biopiracy for discussing working with Venter on a map of genes across the globe (here)
- Interview with Venter where he responds to charges of biopiracy
- ETC discussions
- IPCB comments
One possible solution that has been suggested would be for DNA sequence databases to contain some reference to the country which "owns" the biological resources behind the sequence data. But this does not really protect any potential intellectual property in the data. Patenting DNA sequence has been frowned upon by courts and governments alike, as well as many policy folks. Thus this is probably not an option. As a supporter of open data release and open access to publications, I cannot believe I am about to write this but ... maybe it would be worth considering the DNA patenting issue again if it allowed for release of sequence information and protection from biopiracy.
It seems that there may be a need for DNA sequence databases to record in some way that certain information was produced from a country's biological resources.