tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10781944.post7721307693482602..comments2024-03-28T00:36:36.460-07:00Comments on The Tree of Life: Science Faux Pas #4: Nature wishes their dog ate this advertisementJonathan Eisenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07953790938128734305noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10781944.post-22736126883824153242008-09-29T15:44:00.000-07:002008-09-29T15:44:00.000-07:00Well, you may not get it, but Nature said "The jou...Well, you may not get it, but Nature said <BR/><BR/>"The journal swears they were not being deliberately cheeky. "We didn't know until the issue landed on our desks," Nature pleads. "It just goes to show that editorial and advertising aren't working in cahoots.<BR/><BR/>So that is what I was kind of trying to convey. I am not saying this is a huge screw up. Just a funny slip. Maybe "Freudian Slip" would have been a better title.Jonathan Eisenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07953790938128734305noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10781944.post-61056496534703238682008-09-29T11:42:00.000-07:002008-09-29T11:42:00.000-07:00I guess I'm not seeing the problem. Even if it *wa...I guess I'm not seeing the problem. Even if it *was* deliberate, what's the issue? If it had been a picture of a dog and a human, the candidate who was being "represented" in canine form could see it as an insult, but two dogs?Jonathan Badgerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04921990886076027719noreply@blogger.com