While I agree that the NYT article was particularly hype-filled, all these "Well, it is Craig Venter" style comments are misplaced -- only two of the nine authors of the paper were from JCVI, neither of them were Craig, and they weren't even quoted in the article.
While I agree that the NYT article was particularly hype-filled, all these "Well, it is Craig Venter" style comments are misplaced -- only two of the nine authors of the paper were from JCVI, neither of them were Craig, and they weren't even quoted in the article.
ReplyDelete