Sunday, June 08, 2008

Conflicts of interest, full disclosure, and ethical blogging

Well, I am sure many have heard stories about scientific research ethics gone awry.  The latest is an article in the New York Times about two Harvard Psychiatry Professors who failed to disclose all of their income from consulting to the University and to the government.  The story they report is pretty icky, with what appear to be clear conflicts of interest not being reported fully.  And this is of course nothing new.  Conflicts of interest and unethical behavior occur of course in every walk of life.  But scientists cringe at it because when it occurs it is really damaging to the whole enterprise.  

Well, what about bloggers?  Sure there are bloggers railing against conflict of interest and unethical behavior among scientists/MDs (e.g., see Steven Salzberg's discussion of the recent  "authorship without contribution" controversy).   But that is not what I mean.  What I am interested in here is - what about bloggers disclosing their conflicts of interest?  Is it done?  Is their an ethical code for bloggers?  Should there be?

So I did some web browsing and there is really a remarkable series of discussions about this on blogs and in other places.  For example:
These discussions cover every type of "Science Blogging Ethics" including things like how polite one should be, etc.  Personally, I am not sure I want to go so far as to say their should be a code of ethics.  I think the most important thing to think about is "Full Disclosure" of real and possible conflicts of interest.  Sort of like what "real" news entities do when they are reporting on a story they have some connection to (e.g., the New York Times always puts something like "The New York Times is owned by XXX and the company we are reporting on here is also owned by XXX"  

So from now on I vow to try and do this within my blog (I already do this much of the time when I write about PLoS or my brother but I will try to do it more thoroughly).

4 comments:

  1. I think everyone is sufficiently savvy to know about drug/tobacco companies giving grants to researchers (not that most people approve of this for the obvious conflict of interest issues), but what Salzberg discussed really shocked me -- I had no idea that some drug companies actually wrote papers themselves (or hired other companies to do it!) and then looked for academic "authors" to take credit for the paper...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yeah, the thing Salzberg wrote about blew me away too. Makes me feel better about giving collaborators grief over being VERY careful with author lists.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I added a COI to my About page when I was accused of working for agribusiness. COIs can show lack of conflict of interest as well.

    ReplyDelete
  4. That is a good idea but I want to make sure that some info on COIs shows up in each post since some people grab the post without the about me informaiton.

    ReplyDelete